| 
          back 
            to mainpage | 
         
         
          GEO 
            TV petition dismissed as non-maintainable by Sindh High Court 
            The News 
            December 05, 2007  | 
         
         
          |  
             http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11541 
               
               
              KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday dismissed petitions against 
              the ban on the transmission of Geo TV channels as not maintainable. 
               
            The Independent Media Corporation and Bird (Pvt) 
              Ltd had challenged the ban on the transmission of Geo News, Geo 
              Entertainment, Geo Super and Aag TV channels by the government. 
            The SHC’s division bench comprising Justice 
              Munib Ahmed Khan and Justice Dr Rana Mohammad Shamim dismissed both 
              the petitions being non-maintainable on the ground that under the 
              Provisional Constitution Order and emergency rule, the petitions 
              were not maintainable under the Article 199 of the Constitution 
              because many fundamental rights were suspended. 
            The petitioners’ counsel, Mohammad Ali Mazhar, 
              argued that on the last date of hearing, the deputy attorney general 
              had raised two points that Geo News was off-aired from Dubai and 
              a similar petition by an individual had been filed in the Supreme 
              Court and on the above grounds, further time was sought by him. 
               
            He submitted that in spite of availing many chances, 
              no comments have been filed by the respondents. He said now both 
              the objections raised by the DAG on the last date had become irrelevant 
              and insignificant because the Dubai Media City had already restored 
              the transmission of Geo News and the petition filed by one stranger 
              in the Supreme Court of Pakistan had been returned to him with the 
              office objections that the petitioner before the Supreme Court was 
              not an aggrieved person; secondly the scope of Article 184 (3) had 
              been curtailed under the PCO and emergency.  
            It was further argued by Mohammad Ali Mazhar that 
              being an aggrieved person, the jurisdiction under Article 199 of 
              the Constitution was still available to the petitioners. The petitioner 
              has obtained landing right licences from Pemra against the payment 
              of valuable licence fees which are still valid and without issuing 
              any show-cause notice or written order, the transmission of channels 
              have been suspended verbally which is an illegal act, he contended. 
            The counsel argued that articles 18, 4, 2-A of the 
              Constitution were not suspended under the PCO and being a commercial 
              organisation, the right to business was still available to the petitioners 
              without any hindrance and obstruction. At present, he said, petitions 
              have nothing to do with Article 19 of the Constitution, which relates 
              to the freedom of expression, speech and press.  
            He said verbal ban on TV channels was totally unlawful 
              and against the articles 18, 4 and 2-A of the Constitution of Pakistan. 
              The bench asked the petitioners’ counsel as to how the petition 
              was maintainable in view of the PCO and emergency when certain fundamental 
              rights had been suspended including Article 19.  
            He reiterated, in response, that Articles 18 and 
              4 of the Constitution were not suspended and in support of his argument, 
              he relied upon the full bench judgments of the Supreme Court of 
              Pakistan pronounced in the Sardar Farooq Ahmed Khan Leghari and 
              Zafar Ali Shah cases in which it had been held that in spite of 
              the PCO or emergency, the Article 199 will remain available to an 
              aggrieved person and the right of judicial review of superior courts 
              was not curtailed.  
            The counsel also read to the court and differentiated 
              the scope of Article 199 and Article 184 of the Constitution. Regarding 
              the validity of verbal order, he also relied upon another judgment 
              of the SC in which verbal cancellation order of an allotment of 
              plot was declared illegal by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.  
            It was further argued by the petitioners’ 
              advocate that this action of respondents was also against Section 
              24-A of the General Clauses Act, which makes it mandatory for the 
              respondents to inform the reasons of suspension and also allow opportunity 
              of hearing to the aggrieved persons.  
            The additional advocate general, who was on court 
              notice, relied upon a condition of landing right license and said 
              that in emergency, the authority might suspend the license. The 
              petitioners’ counsel submitted that this condition was irrelevant 
              in the present circumstances where except the Geo TV’s four 
              channels, all other channels banned on the same day with Geo TV 
              had been now restored and this condition was not applicable to Geo 
              only.  
            He further argued that even applying this condition, 
              it was necessary for Pemra to issue show-cause notice or reasons 
              to Geo TV channels but except a verbal direction to cable TV operators 
              nothing was communicated in writing. The act of Pemra, besides being 
              discriminatory, is also a serious violation of Section 24-A of General 
              Clauses Act and also against Pemra’s own laws, rules and regulations. 
               
            Mohammad Ali Mazhar submitted many other foreign 
              origin channels were being relayed even in emergency situation and 
              Geo – a Pakistani origin channel – was under suspension. 
              On this provision, the bench also asked the additional advocate 
              general that how even in an emergency, a channel could be suspended 
              without any written order or notice, to which no response was given 
              by him, except saying that the petitioners had accepted the terms 
              and conditions of license hence they had no right to challenge it. 
               
            The petitioners’ counsel, in response to this 
              argument, argued that the petitioners did not only accept the terms 
              and conditions of their landing right licenses but also accepted 
              all Pemra laws but the present action of suspension of Geo TV transmission 
              was not supported by any Pemra law, rules or regulations and was 
              also against the principle of natural justice.  
            He further submitted that by these petitions, the 
              PCO or emergency had not been challenged but it was urged that the 
              petitioners were lawful licensee and Pemra being a statutory body 
              should act and treat the petitioners in accordance with the law 
              and their right to business had been seriously infringed by the 
              unlawful ban.  
            The court observed that on the one hand the DAG 
              took the plea that the government took no action against the petitioners 
              and on the other he stated that the attorney general for Pakistan 
              himself would advance arguments against the petitions.  
            The bench asked DAG Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui as to 
              what was the actual stand of the government. However, after hearing 
              the arguments, the court dismissed both the petitions on technical 
              grounds.  
             It was 
              the sixth date of hearing on Tuesday and after at least more than 
              23 days, the bench dismissed the petitions as being non-maintainable 
              under the PCO and emergency, while no written comments were filed 
              by the respondent in spite of availing many chances. The detailed 
              judgment in the petitions will be given later by the court. 
              | 
         
         
          SC 
            returns petition challenging closure of TV channels  
            Sohail Khan, The News 
            December 05, 2007  | 
         
         
          |   http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11547 
               
            ISLAMABAD: The 
              Supreme Court on Tuesday returned the constitutional petition challenging 
              the closure of TV channels as well as amending the provisions of 
              the Pemra Ordinance 2002 with the objections that the petition was 
              not maintainable as the petitioner had no locus standi to file it. 
               
            A letter addressed 
              to Advocate-on-Record (AOR) of the Supreme Court Ejaz Muhammad Khan, 
              a copy of which is available with The News, stated that the said 
              constitutional petition filed by him under Article 184(3) of the 
              Constitution was not entertainable as prima facie the petitioner 
              had no locus standi to file it.  
            It was further 
              stated that the constitutional petition had been filed under Article 
              184(3) of the Constitution but after the promulgation of Provisional 
              Constitution Order (PCO), the scope of the said article of the Constitution 
              had been curtailed.  
            Similarly, the 
              advocate-on-record was also informed that he had not provided the 
              certificate as required under Order XXV Rule 6 of the Supreme Court 
              Rules 1980. “The constitutional petition is therefore, returned 
              herewith in original being not entertainable along with its paper 
              books,” says the letter.  
            Restrictions 
              on TV channels clamped on November 3 after the proclamation of emergency 
              and the imposition of the PCO were challenged in the Supreme Court, 
              praying that restrictions on the channels be declared illegal, void 
              and without lawful authority.  
            The petition 
              was filed in the superior court the other day by Qazi Sheharyar 
              Iqbal, advocate, praying the apex court that the blocked TV channels 
              should be allowed to start their normal operations so as to enable 
              the people of Pakistan to enjoy their right of choice of information 
              and freedom of speech and expression.  
            The petition 
              was filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, making the Federation 
              of Pakistan through the secretary Ministry of Information and the 
              Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) through its 
              chairman as respondents.  
            The petitioner 
              had challenged the promulgation of Ordinance, LXV of 2007 whereby 
              the provisions of the Pemra Ordinance, 2002 were further amended. 
               
            He had prayed 
              to the court to strike down the provisions of Sections 20 and 33 
              of the ordinance of 2002 and other provisions being unreasonable 
              restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed 
              under the Constitution along with any further relief which the court 
              considered just and proper in the facts and circumstance of the 
              case.  
                 | 
         
         
          Govt 
            retires 24 High Court judges  
            The News 
            December 05, 2007  | 
         
         
          |   http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11540 
            12 SHC, 10 LHC, 
              two PHC judges had refused to take oath under PCO 
               
              ISLAMABAD: 
              The government on Tuesday issued a notification of retirement of 
              24 High Court judges who did not take oath under the Provisional 
              Constitution Order (PCO).  
            According to 
              the notification issued by the Ministry of Law, the judges who stand 
              retired include 12 judges of the Sindh High Court (SHC), 10 of the 
              Lahore High Court (LHC) and two judges of the Peshawar High Court 
              (PHC).  
            The retired 
              Sindh High Court judges are Justice Ahmed Hussain Jaffery, Justice 
              Khilji Arif Hussain, Justice Amir Hani Muslim, Justice Gulzar Ahmed, 
              Justice Maqbool Baqar, Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Justice Faisal 
              Arab, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Justice Zafar Khan Sherwani, Justice 
              Salman Ansari, Justice Abdul Rasheed Kalhwar, and Justice Arshad 
              Siraj. 
            The Lahore High 
              Court judges who have been retired are Justice Khwaja Muhammad Sharif, 
              Justice Saqib Nisar, Justice Asif Khosa, Justice Muhammad Tahir 
              Ali, Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Justice M A Shahid Siddiqui, Justice 
              Muhammad Jahangir Arshad, Justice Iqbal Hameed-ur-Rehman, Justice 
              Muhammad Ata Bandial and Justice Shaikh Azmat Saeed.  
            Two judges of 
              the Peshawar High Court Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan and Justice Dost 
              Muhammad were also included in the list of retired judges. Online 
              adds: More than 60 judges including Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice 
              Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Chief Justice Sindh High Court Justice 
              Sabih Uddin Ahmed and Chief Justice Peshawar High Court Justice 
              Tariq Pervez refused to take oath under the PCO following its promulgation 
              and imposition of emergency rule in the country on November 03. 
            According to 
              Attorney General Malik Qayyum, the services of these judges were 
              terminated the moment they refused to take fresh oath under the 
              PCO while the notification issued by the law ministry on Tuesday 
              was aimed to complete the official proceedings.  
            Sources told 
              the Online that the president was not ready to accept the demand 
              of different circles with regard to the reinstatement of the deposed 
              judges of the Supreme Court and the high courts. After lifting emergency 
              and the end of the PCO on December 16, the deposed judges will not 
              be reinstated because their services have been terminated. 
              | 
         
         
          Deposed 
            judges get letters to vacate official residences  
            Umar Cheema, The News 
            December 05, 2007  | 
         
         
          | http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11555 
              ISLAMABAD: 
              The Supreme Court has allotted residences of deposed judges to newly 
              appointed judges, who took oath under the Provisional Constitution 
              Order (PCO). 
            However, the 
              residence of deposed chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry has 
              not been allotted to Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, the new chief justice 
              of post-Nov 3 Supreme Court. 
            The assistant 
              registrar, who issued this office order, was reluctant to speak 
              on the subject. The Supreme Court registrar was not available for 
              comments while the PRO denied any knowledge about this development. 
              An honourable deposed judge, Justice Rana Bhagwandas, confirmed 
              to The News having received a written intimation in this regard 
              from the court and termed it a pressure tactic. 
            Justice Bhagwandas, 
              however, told The News that their residences had been allotted to 
              the new PCO judges despite availability of a number of bungalows 
              lying vacant nearby and were sufficient to accommodate new comers. 
            Even the residence 
              of a deposed judge, Justice Javed Iqbal, has been allotted to a 
              veteran PCO judge, Justice Faqir Mohammad Khokhar, already residing 
              in the Judges Enclave. Khokhar's present bungalow has been designated 
              to a new PCO judge, Justice Qaim Jan. 
            The bungalow 
              of another deposed judge, Sardar Raza Muhammad Khan, has been allotted 
              to Musa Leghari, a newly appointed Supreme Court judge. 
            Ejazul Hassan, 
              another newly appointed judge, has been allotted the residence of 
              the deposed judge, Shakirullah Jan. Justice Shabbir Akhtar has been 
              allotted the bungalow of deposed judge Tasadduq Jillani.Deposed 
              Justice Ghulam Rabbani's bungalow has been allotted to Justice Zia 
              Pervez. 
            About the chief 
              justice's residence, he said it was a designated house for the chief 
              justice and has not been allotted to Justice Dogar. 
            Justice Bhagwandas, 
              however, said the official letter he and other colleagues received 
              did not mention any time frame to vacate the residences. "By 
              making new allotments, they seem to have implied as if the residences 
              were lying vacant," he said. Presently, there are 18 bungalows 
              in the Judges Enclave. One each has been allotted to Federal Shariat 
              Court's Chief Justice Fida Muhammad Khan and Federal Tax Ombudsman 
              Justice Munir A Sheikh.  | 
         
        
          Musharraf 
            PR team faces protest from Pakistanis in UK 
            Malaysia Sun 
            December 5, 2007  | 
         
        
          | http://story.malaysiasun.com/index.php/ct/9/cid/303b19022816233b/id/306431/cs/1/ 
             London: Pakistanis living 
              in London have mounted a counter campaign against the week-long 
              visit of former ISI chief Lt-General (retired) Javed Ashraf Qazi 
              and former State Information Minister Tariq Azim, who appears to 
              be on a PR job for President Pervez Musharraf.  
            The Campaign Against 
              Martial Law in Pakistan (CAMLP), a recently formed group of Pakistani 
              students, lawyers, doctors, journalists and civil society activists 
              in the UK, have sent protest notes to all those British officials 
              and non-officials who have consented to meet Musharraf's special 
              envoys.  
            The group has also chalked 
              out an elaborate programme to stage protest demonstrations in front 
              of all the meeting venues where the two would be visiting to present 
              their version of what is happening in Pakistan.  
            On Tuesday, Qazi and 
              Azim, met Lord Mark Malloch Brown, Minister of State for Africa, 
              Asia and United Nations, MP Khalid Mahmood, members of All Party 
              Parliamentary Group, and Mike Gapes, Chairman Foreign Affairs Committee 
              of House of Commons and members of Pakistani community.  
            On Wednesday, Azim would 
              be participating in a panel discussion on 'The plight of Pakistani 
              media under emergency rule' at the Foreign Press Association.  
            Ali Dayan of Human Rights 
              Watch would present the Pakistani media's case and Azim will defend 
              Musharraf's current media policy.  
            On the same day, the 
              special envoys would meet the members of the Pakistan-British Trade 
              and Investment Forum at the Asia House, the Dawn reported.  
             | 
         
        
          US 
            envoy hopes Musharraf will lift emergency, PCO on Dec 16 
            DailyIndia 
            December 5, 2007 | 
         
        
          | http://www.dailyindia.com/show/197106.php/US-envoy-hopes-Musharraf-will-lift-emergency-PCO-on-Dec-16 
                
            Karachi, Dec 5: The United 
              States Consul General, K Anski, has hoped that President Pervez 
              Musharraf would lift the emergency and the Provisional Constitutional 
              Order (PCO) on December 16.  
            Anski said she was visiting 
              various parts of the country, particularly the Sindh province, and 
              had found that Musharraf had taken some steps which might rightly 
              be described as confidence building measures, something the US Government 
              is really interested in.  
            She suggested that the 
              political parties should take part in the January 8 general election. 
               
            Anski said Musharraf 
              had assured the international community of holding fair, free and 
              transparent elections in Pakistan.  
            She said the US also 
              was deeply concerned about the arrest of political leaders, lawyers 
              and civil society representatives and wanted immediate release of 
              all such prisoners.  
            Commenting on the freedom 
              of media, Anski said lifting the emergency would ultimately relax 
              the ban on media, The News reported.  
            She said the US government 
              had reiterated upon Musharraf to restore the transmission of Geo 
              News without any further delay. 
             | 
         
        | 
    
      
       
     |