PhD student's scholarship guarantee for France turns out to be fake

By Awais Yousafzai
January 04, 2025

IHC says Higher Education Commission can initiate proceedings against scholar and relevant officials

Representational image of a student wearing a graduation cap. — AFP

A guarantee submitted by a Pakistani PhD scholar, who was going to France on a scholarship, turned out to be fake.

The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) submitted a report to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) after findingdiscrepancy in the signature via a scientific examination.

Following the report, the court ordered the Higher Education Commission (HEC) to not recoverRs25 million from the guarantor who had been appointed for getting a scholarship.

The IHC said the HEC canregister a case and initiate criminal proceedings against the PhD scholar Imran Taj as well as the officials who were involved in the matter.

According to the FIA's report, thescientific examination of the documentsrevealed that the questioned signatures "do nottally in characteristics such as fluency, hesitation, pen pressure and slow drawn with respect to the provided corresponding specimen and routine signatures of Abdul Waheed".

Moreover, the court also ordered the commission to imposestrict conditions on the scholarship program in the future, directing it toreform its scholarship policy and issued guidelines.

A 12-page judgment issued by IHC Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani declared null and void the judgment of the recovery suit filed by the civil judge Islamabad in favour of HEC to recover €85,406 and Rs76,386 Abdul Waheed — the guarantor.

According to the judgement, Taj had signed an agreement with HEC after applying for scholarship thatwould serve in Pakistan for four years after the completion but he violated it.

He had submitted Waheed's property documents as aguarantor, however, Waheed revealed that they were fake as he did not sign them. Following the examination of the documents, they turned out to be fake.

The IHC said that thetrial court did not attempt to verify the signatures despite the appellant’s refusal, adding that the HEC does not have anyauthority to recover from the appellant as a guarantor.

The court said that the commission can initiate proceedings against Taj and the relevant officials. It also provided guidelines to avoid these kind of incidents in the future.


Next Story >>>

More From Pakistan