Diplomatic setback for India at UN

Web Desk

January 11, 2021

Flags fluttering outside the UN building in New York. File photo

Aware of Indian agenda, UNSC members rebuffed the Modi government's efforts to get chairmanship of powerful 1267 Al-Qaeda/Daesh Sanctions Committee
A UNSC source told APP that India tried its utmost, until the very last moment, to get this position but failed to convince diplomats
India will head the Libya sanctions committees which is lying dormant and has no importance at UN

UNITED NATIONS: The Narendra Modi government suffered a major diplomatic setback when its bid to secure the chairmanship of some of the most important subsidiary bodies of the UN Security Council could not muster support from other members of the 15-nation body, state-run APP reported Sunday citing sources.

The sources told the APP that the Indians pushed for, but failed, to win the chairmanship of the powerful 1267 Al-Qaeda/Daesh Sanctions Committee and the 1540 Non-proliferation Committee. It was also unable to become the custodian of the Afghanistan file in the security council.

Aware of India’s narrow bilateral agenda to utilise the Al-Qaeda and Daesh Sanctions Committee for its own purposes, the vast majority of the Council members were opposed to giving India the chairmanship of this key committee, the source said.

A UNSC source told the news agency that India tried its utmost, until the very last moment, to get this position, lobbying intensively in New York and in the capitals of the council’s members, but failed to convince them.

According to the source, it is no secret that New Delhi’s bid for the post was designed to advance India’s own agenda, mainly against Pakistan. "The work of the Al-Qaeda Sanctions Committee is too important to be given in the hands of the Indians,” an African diplomat remarked.

Pakistan last year submitted four listings of Indian nationals for supporting Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Jamaatul Ahrar (JuA) in Afghanistan. But these listings were blocked by some of India’s friends in the Al-Qaeda Sanctions Committee. More recently, Pakistan also conveyed information on the financing and arming of the TTP and JuA, the two terrorist groups listed on the committee’s terrorism list.

Non-proliferation Committee

Similarly, India’s bid for the Non-proliferation Committee encountered resistance in the Security Council, diplomats said.

Many Western countries considered that India was not suited to head this important panel since it is not a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This raises a serious question mark regarding New Delhi’s nuclear status.

Afghan file

India also wanted to manage the Afghanistan issue in the Security Council but found that even some of its close friends felt that India’s role would not be positive in advancing the Afghan peace process.

The Afghan file was given instead to two European countries, which the council members consider will play a more impartial and constructive role in the present delicate phase of the situation in Afghanistan.

As a sop to India’s wounded pride, it was given the chairmanship of the 1988-Taliban Sanctions Committee, where the proposals for listing and delisting of individuals rests mainly with the US and other permanent members of the Council and the chair’s role is minimal.

About the hype created by the Indian UN Mission about assuming the chairmanship of the 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC), a Western diplomat noted that India has been given only a one-year rather than the normal two-year term as the chair of this currently dormant committee and that too deferred until next year when the incumbent chair leaves the Council.

In addition, India will head the Libya sanctions committees which is also lying dormant.

All in all, it’s not been a good start for India’s domestically heralded two-year term on the Security Council, according to UN diplomats.