Biden says unlikely US will be able to withdraw troops from Afghanistan by May 1

Under an agreement negotiated by the Trump administration with Taliban, the US was supposed to pull out all troops by May 1

By
AFP
US President Joe Biden answers a question during his first press briefing in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 25, 2021. Photo: AFP

  • Under an agreement negotiated by Donald Trump's administration with the Afghan Taliban, the US was supposed to pull out all troops by May 1.
  • New US President Joe Biden now says it is going to be difficult to meet the May 1 deadline due to 'tactical reasons'.
  • The Afghan Taliban have previously warned of "consequences" if Washington does not stick to the agreed timetable.


WASHINGTON: US President Joe Biden said on Thursday that it was unlikely that Washington will be able meet the May 1 troop withdrawal deadline for Afghanistan, but vowed to end America's longest war within the year.

"It is going to be hard to meet the May 1 deadline in terms of tactical reasons. It's hard to get those troops out," Biden said in his first press conference since taking office on January 20.

"We will leave; the question is when we leave," he said. "But we're not staying a long time."

Read more: US may not withdraw troops from Afghanistan by May 1, claims report

Asked whether he envisions US soldiers still in Afghanistan in 2022, the president said: "I can't picture that being the case."

Under an agreement negotiated by Donald Trump's administration with the Taliban, the United States is supposed to pull out all its troops by May 1, nearly two decades after the invasion in the wake of the September 11 attacks.

The Taliban in turn promised to open peace talks with President Ashraf Ghani's government, although there has been little sign of headway since the meetings began in September in Qatar.

The group also vowed not to allow Afghan territory to be used by "terrorists" — the original goal of the US invasion following the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Read more: US Defense Secretary meets Afghan President Ghani amid peace process review

Biden's acknowledgement comes one week after he said he was in the process of making a decision over the troops, and that a withdrawal on time "could happen, but it is tough."

'Safe and orderly'

Last week the Taliban warned there would be "consequences" if Washington did not stick to the agreed timetable — further raising pressure on the fragile peace process.

On Thursday, Biden noted ongoing international discussions on Afghanistan, including Secretary of State Antony Blinken's meetings with NATO allies that have troops in Afghanistan.

"If we leave, we're going to do so in a safe and orderly way," Biden said.

Turkey has been organising a conference of major powers on Afghanistan in hopes of building international consensus on the country's future.

Read more: Turkey plans to host Afghan peace talks in April, appoint special envoy

The Taliban have largely stuck to a promise not to attack US or other foreign troops since the agreement was struck in February last year, but they say the date for the withdrawal of US troops is inflexible.

As Barack Obama's vice president, Biden was one of the most prominent proponents of winding down the US involvement in Afghanistan, judging that little else can be gained.

But he has recently mused about leaving a residual force in Afghanistan to carry out counterterrorism operations — an option likely to be rejected by the Taliban.

Representative Adam Smith, a member of Biden's Democratic Party who heads the House Armed Services Committee, said this week that the administration wanted at least to sound out the Taliban on allowing a counterterrorism force.

But he said that the overall decision remained to withdraw.

"I'm not terribly optimistic," he said of Afghanistan's future, "but I don't think that lack of optimism changes if the US stays for another year or another 10."

Read more: Following Moscow summit, Afghan government, Taliban agree to expedite peace talks

Speaking to a forum of Foreign Policy magazine, Smith said the delay was "purely logistical."

"Running for the exits pell-mell by May 1 is dangerous," he said.

"If someone can present to me the military argument that between now and May 1 we can yank 10,000 troops and all the support staff and all the equipment and everything out, well, then you're a miracle worker," he said, giving a figure that includes allies.