Kulbhushan Jadhav not given NRO: Farogh Naseem tells NA

By
Web Desk
Naseem had arrived in NA minutes are taking oath to defend the governments's decision to pass the ordinance and counter the opposition’s claim that govt had given an NRO to Indian spy Khulbhushan Jadhav. Photo: File

ISLAMABAD: Law Minister Farogh Naseem, after taking oath a few minutes earlier, told the National Assembly on Friday that the government has not given any concessions — similar to the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) — to convicted Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav.

Naseem had arrived at the lower house of the Parliament after taking oath from President Arif Alvi to respond to the opposition’s claim that the government had given an NRO to Jadhav.

The minister, in his speech, said in the last few days an ordinance was brought regarding the Indian RAW agent. He added that it was his responsibility to inform everyone regarding the "facts" pertaining to the case of the Indian spy. 

The minister said Jadhav was arrested on March 3, 2016 and the PML-N-led government at that time had decided not to grant consular access to the Indian spy. He added that the PML-N government had not given consular access as Jadhav was caught for spying in Pakistan.

The minister said that on May 8, 2017 India had filed the case in the ICJ regarding the Indian spy and asked the court to direct Pakistan to release him. He added that the ICJ rejected India’s appeal but directed Pakistan to grant consular access to him.

“The ordinance was issued in view of the ICJ verdict. This ordinance is not an NRO. The NRO was issued by Musharraf,” said the minister. He added that if Pakistan had not given consular access to India, then New Delhi would have raised the issue in front of the world.

“If the ordinance was not brought then India would have gone to the UN Security Council. Pakistan has cut India’s hand by bringing in the ordinance,” said Naseem, adding that New Delhi would have sought sanctions against Islamabad if it didn't issue the ordinance. 

“Where is it written in the ordinance that the conviction has ended?” asked the minister, adding that neither has the sentence been cut nor has the Indian spy been given any concession.

The minister also told the assembly that nowhere was it written that the government needed to speak to the opposition before bringing in an ordinance. He added that the ordinance was not produced by anyone from “under a pillow" and no one should be blamed for it.

Bilawal accuses PTI govt of giving NRO

On Thursday, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari had alleged in the National Assembly that the PTI government and Prime Minister Imran Khan were trying to give concessions similar to the NRO to Jadhav.

In a thunderous speech in the National Assembly, where the ordinance related to Jadhav’s appeal against the military court verdict was being discussed, Bilawal said that the prime minister, since day one, has been saying that he will not give an NRO to anyone.

“The amount of NROs PM Imran gave, in the history of Pakistan, no dictator or leader has [ever] given,” said the PPP leader, adding that when the Senate took up the matter of the Indian spy, the government issued an ordinance in this regard.

The PPP responded to an earlier statement of PTI senator and minister Shireen Mazari, who said that the PTI (when in opposition) had taken a stance against accepting the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in the case.

“If you are not acknowledging the jurisdiction of the international courts that does not mean you give NRO through the Pakistani laws to an Indian spy,” retorted Bilawal, as the opposition members thumped their desks in approval.

Bilawal had criticised the government after Foreign Office officials, earlier this month, said that Jadhav has been given a fresh opportunity by Pakistan to file review petition against his sentence and conviction and also shared that the country had enacted a special ordinance for him to do so.

Addressing a press conference in Islamabad, FO Director-General South Asia Zahid Hafeez and Additional Attorney General Ahmad Irfan explained that Pakistan has taken all necessary steps as per the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) decision and that the country's law allowed for a review of the decision from the start.

A review and reconsideration petition could be filed by Jadhav, his legally-authorised representative or a consular officer of the Indian High Commission at the Islamabad High Court (IHC), Hafeez said, adding that Pakistan had offered to assist in arranging a legal representative for the spy.

He explained that Pakistan had on May 20 enacted the ICJ Review and Reconciliation Ordinance, under which a review petition may be submitted to the IHC within 60 days of the legislation coming into effect.

The 60-day time limit had ended on July 19.

"Commander Kulbushan Jadhav or his lawyer may file a mercy appeal. [He] was offered on June 17, 2020, to file a review petition but he declined," the officials had said.