Can't connect right now! retry
pakistan
Thursday Apr 22 2021
By
Web Desk

LHC approves Shehbaz Sharif's bail

By
Web Desk
PML-N President Shehbaz Sharif. Photo: File

  • LHC questions NAB over origin of telegraphic transfers done in accounts of Shahabaz Sharif and family.
  • Former Punjab CM's lawyer claims NAB has registered the asset beyond means case under pressure from the government. 
  • Three-member bench after hearing the arguments issued bail to the opposition leader against two surety bonds of Rs5 million each.


LAHORE: The Lahore Hight Court (LHC) on Thursday approved the bail of Opposition Leader in the National Assembly Shahbaz Sharif. 

As per Geo News, the bail was approved by the judges unanimously. 

At the onset of the hearing, the court asked the NAB prosecutor to present his arguments in the case. However, it opposed the arguments given by Shahbaz’s lawyer Azam Nazeer Tarar.

Read more: Don't guess verdict till written order issued, says Lahore High Court on Shahbaz Sharif's bail hearing

“Yesterday, Shahbaz Sharif's lawyers did not see that the bail was rejected after approval,” said NAB's lawyer, at which Tarar objected.

To this, the court also told Tarar that it had issued certain directions to him. Shahbaz’s lawyer told the court that if NAB had objections, it can issue a contempt notice to him.

Seeing the verbal scuffle between them, the bench warned that it would adjourn the hearing if both lawyers continued. Tarar then took a back seat and the court allowed the NAB lawyer to continue with his arguments.

The NAB prosecutor told the bench that Shahbaz's five sons and daughter are absconding.

“Suleman Shehbaz, Nusrat Shahbaz, Rabia Imran, Haroon Yousuf, Syed Tahir Naqvi and Ali Hamid are absconding,” said NAB’s lawyer Faisal Raza Bukhari.

Read more: Why has Shahbaz Sharif's release on bail been delayed?

Bukhari told the court that the high court had instructed Nusrat Shehbaz to be part of the case via her lawyer. He added that NAB does not oppose the move.

The prosecutor then told the court that NAB had send call-up notices to the accused in the case, but no received response.

Bukhari told the bench that in 1990, Shehbaz had showed assets of Rs2.1 million and in 1998 they had risen to Rs10.48 million. He then claimed that from 2010-2018 the Model Town residence of Shehbaz was turned into a camp office for the chief minister.

Bukhari said that the opposition leader showed assets of Rs7.32 billion and all the assets were gained after 2005.

Read more: PML-N concerned over delay in Shahbaz Sharif’s release despite court order 4 days ago

The NAB prosecutor claimed that 23 telegraphic transfers (TTs) were made to Hamza Shahbaz’s account. He added that Rabia and Javeria had received telegraphic transfers worth millions too.

The NAB lawyer further told the bench that they had found 12 TTs worth Rs112 million in contractual employee Nasir Ahmed’s account.

“Rs 1.8 billion was transferred in Good Nature company’s account. These companies were operated by Haroon Yousuf,” said the NAB prosecutor.

He added that when Hamza would campaign, people would transfer funds to PML-N’s account. He claimed that Hamza had brought a bullet proof car from that money.

At this, the court asked NAB if they had added the bulletproof car accusation to the charge sheet. The NAB lawyer then told the court that it was not included in the charge sheet.

Read more: Court orders Shahbaz Sharif be vaccinated for coronavirus within two days

“Rs55 million was received as party funds. A cheque from a private society had also come from the party funds,” said the NAB prosecutor.

The court then asked the NAB lawyer to tell them what details had been after investigating the TTs.

At this, the NAB lawyer told the court that the TTs were sent by people who said they had never left Pakistan. He added that some did not even have a passport.

“Which country were the TTs made from?”asked the court.

The NAB lawyer told the court that the TTs were from Dubai and the United Kingdom.

“For what reason were these TTs sent,” the court then asked.

“They have no response for this,” interjected Shahbaz’s counsel Amjad Pervaiz upon the court’s questioning.

However, Bukhari told the court that their case was of assets beyond means.

Read more: Shahbaz Sharif administered coronavirus vaccine in Lahore's Kot Lakhpat Jail

“NAB has no response for why and what reason the money had come,” said Shahbaz’s counsel at NAB’s response.

Hearing the response, Justice Baqar Najafi asked the NAB lawyer again if the body had investigated the TTs and where they had come from.

“When we investigated them, people said they had not gone out of the country,” Bukhari told the judge. He added that when they further investigated the transactions, they found they had come from the UAE.

“There must be a source who can tell how and who sent the money,” the court then asked the NAB lawyer.

“The money that used to come must have come for a reason, tell us,” said Justice Najafi. He added that when an asset beyond means case is registered, NAB looks at the illegal ways through which money was transferred.

“How do you call the [transactions] anonymous?” asked Justice Najafi.

At this, the NAB prosecutor said that Shahbaz does not have a source of income. He added that Salman Shahbaz had revealed his assets in 1995, 1996 and 2008.

Read more: Money laundering case against Shahbaz, family put off till May 4

“These are assets of Salman Shahbaz what relation do they have with Shahbaz Sharif?” asked Justice Najafi.

At this, the NAB prosecutor stated that they are the Benami transaction makers of Shahbaz Sharif. He added that it was the former Punjab CM that turned his wife’s residence into a camp office.

At this, Shahbaz’s lawyer intervened and said that the former CM still lives in that house.

Upon hearing this, Justice Najafi quipped that these days Shahbaz Sharif lives in jail. The judge’s quirky response resulted in a burst of laughter in the courtroom.

After the NAB prosecutor wrapped up his arguments, Shahbaz’s lawyer Amjad Pervaiz came to the rostrum and told the bench that NAB had declared members of Shahbaz Sharif’s family benamidars with malafide intentions.

Pervaiz claimed that NAB registered the asset beyond means case under pressure from the government. He added that not even one witness had testified against his client.

The three-member bench after hearing the arguments issued bail to the opposition leader against two surety bonds of Rs5 million each.