Can't connect right now! retry
pakistan
Thursday Apr 08 2021
By
Web Desk

Gillani files intra-court appeal against IHC's verdict on Senate chairman polls

By
Web Desk
File photo of PPP leader Yousaf Raza Gillani.
  • Former prime minister and Opposition Leader in the Senate Yousaf Raza Gillani files an intra-court appeal in IHC.
  • PPP leader seeks annulment of single bench judgment in the intra-court appeal.
  • Demands immediate suspension of presiding officer's decision regarding the Senate election.


A former prime minister and the current Opposition Leader in the Senate, Yousaf Raza Gillani has filed an intra-court appeal in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) against the Senate chairman election.

Earlier, IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah had declared Gillani's plea, challenging Sadiq Sanjrani’s victory as the Senate chairman, non-maintainable.

The PPP leader has sought annulment of the single bench judgment in the intra-court appeal, requesting that the decision of the presiding officer to reject seven votes should be quashed.

The Opposition leader has also demanded immediate suspension of the presiding officer's decision regarding the Senate election.

An intra-court appeal has been filed by Gillani through his lawyer Farooq H Naik, Javed Iqbal Venus, and Barrister Umar Sheikh.

Read more: Opposition all set to challenge Sadiq Sanjrani's Senate win in court today

Speaking about the Senate chairman polls results, PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto Zardari had earlier said that his party believes in the supremacy of the Constitution and the Parliament, but the polling process at a polling station cannot be described as parliamentary proceedings.

“The PDM candidate Senator Yousaf Raza Gillani had challenged the decision of a presiding officer of the polling station in the Senate Hall. This presiding officer had rejected seven votes identifying them as the ones obtained by Gillani,” he had said in a statement.

Bilawal had said the PPP would exercise its legitimate right to go to an elevated forum to seek justice under the principle that a presiding officer of a polling station has no right to engineer the polling process and results.