Senate bill seeks constitutional amendment for ECP appointments procedure
January 13, 2020
ISLAMABAD: A private member bill was introduced in the Senate on Monday seeking to amend the Constitution's Articles 213 and 215, which lay down the requirements for the appointment of the chief and members of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).
The bill, which was moved by Senator Lt Gen (R) Abdul Qayyum in the House, suggests changes in the procedure of appointments of the CEC and ECP members, proposing that the CEC be appointed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
Under existing laws, the appointments of the CEC and ECP members is carried out after consensus between the government and opposition.
The introduction of the private member bill follows a months deadlock between the government and opposition over appointments to the key positions.
Criticising the bill, Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs said that the matter of the appointments of the CEC and ECP members must be resolved in the parliament. The minister, however, also acknowledged that the government and opposition had hit a dead-end over the key appointments.
Also read: ECP issues list of lawmakers failing to disclose asset details
The Senate chairman referred the Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2019 (Amendment of Articles 213 and 215) to the concerned standing committee.
The position of CEC has been vacant after Sardar Mohammad Raza’s retirement on December 5, 2019.
According to The News, contacts were made between the government and opposition to break the deadlock. Former prime minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, who represents the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), told The News that the government has indicated that it will give a new name for chief election commissioner (CEC).
Last week a source had told The News that, “Neither side is willing to accept the other’s proposals, and hence the deadlock continues, which may be broken with the new recommendations.”
The source further said that the government is insistent on choosing Babar Yaqoob Fateh as the CEC while the opposition is equally adamant not to agree to his choice.
