June 27, 2025
The chief of staff that facilitated Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ freak offs over the years has found herself at the center of attention, after past court dates saw her getting compared to Ghislaine Maxwell.
For those unversed, Maxwell was named co-conspirator who was working alongside Jeffrey Epstein in getting underage girls paired up with Hollywood’s elite.
In light of all that litigator John J. Perlstein turned to Fox News Digital and explained how ‘weak’ these claims make the Diddy case.
In his eyes “from what we’ve seen so far, the comparison between Kristina Khorram and Ghislaine Maxwell isn’t really a fair one, given that Epstein’s victims were underage girls.”
“Still, Khorram is an alleged co-conspirator in the Diddy case, so it makes sense that she wouldn’t want to testify, as she would’ve likely had to plead the Fifth.”
It is also pertinent to mention that, “While Ghislaine Maxwell was not originally charged in the Jeffrey Epstein case, charges were eventually filed against her. That’s likely what we see happening here with Khorram and the Diddy case.”
However, that also means “the criminal enterprise case against Diddy is extremely weak, and it’s possible that the case against Khorram would be even weaker.”
KK is also the same person who facilitated the sale of the 2016 InterContinental footage where Diddy was seen dragging Cassie Ventura by her hair, throwing her to the ground and kicking her repeatedly.
For those unversed, the government recently released a document stating the same, that will no longer be perusing charges related to attempted kidnapping, attempted arson nor aiding and abetting sex trafficking.
Per the same outlet the document reads, “The Government understands the Court’s desire for streamlined instructions. With that in mind, the Government has suggested ways to streamline those instructions.”
“Specifically, the Government has removed instructions from the charge relating to (i) attempted kidnapping under both California and New York law, (ii) attempted arson under California law, and (iii) aiding and abetting sex trafficking. The Government is no longer planning to proceed on these theories of liability so instructions are no longer necessary.”